Breaking Sydney News.Net - The Sydney News.Net
     
Home

50,000 in South Korea protest against U.S. beef imports

The Sydney News.Net
Saturday 5th July, 2008

South Korean police estimate 50,000 people turned out in Seoul Saturday in the latest protest against the resumption of U.S. beef imports.

About 20,000 riot police were deployed throughout the capital. There were no clashes between protesters and police.

Large protests have been held in Seoul on a near-daily basis since the new government of President Lee Myung-bak agreed to resume U.S. beef imports in April. The protests were sparked by fears of mad cow disease, which triggered a ban on American beef imports in 2003.

The protests forced Seoul to renegotiate the deal to limit U.S. beef from cattle under 30 months old, which are considered less susceptible to mad cow disease.

The rallies have declined in number since an estimated 80,000 people gathered in Seoul on June 10, but some have turned violent in recent days.

The protests have evolved into an expression of outrage against Mr. Lee's policies.

U.S. beef went back on the South Korean market this week. Retailers say the initial sales of U.S. beef have been successful, despite major supermarkets' reluctance to sell it for fear of a public backlash.

Email this story to a friend



Comments on this story

hlasny
07-06-08, 04:38 AM

50,000 in South Korea protest against U.S. beef imports

WHY a public South Koreans fear about mad cow (BSE) disease; when beef is safe in the all world? So WHY a risk about the BSE infectiosity? Where is a central role of British infectious proteins? (from meat and bone meal- MBM) in BSE- when there is not any evidence about this?
For example see Statement of Ben GILL (April, 1998) ; former chairman of the Livestock and Wool Committee of the National Farmers' Union (NFU) , he says:
“I have been involved in the emerging story of BSE since the NFU first learnt of the existence of a nine cattle in July 1987. I was vice chairman and chairman of the Livestock and Wool Committee of the NFU (1986-1991). Feed compounds used for feeding cattle, farmers may buy compound feed from feed producers. The actual ingredients used will vary from time to time and from producer to producer. These are commercial decisions taken by the feed producers. For example, protein could amongst others be generated by soya bean meal, or from processed meat and bone meal (MBM). At the time that feed producers switched from soya bean meal to meat and bone meal, there would have been no restrictions on them doing so. A farmer buying compound feed would not know what ingredients had been used to provide protein. He would not know if the protein source in the compound was soya bean meal or meat and bone meal(MBM). The arguments for a declaration of ingredients are well rehearsed in an NFU paper prepared in March 1983. The absence of ingredient listing meant that farmers buying compound feedstffs would not know whether or not the feed included meat and bone meal(MBM), and if so, whether it was bovine or ovine meat and bone meal(MBM)? The alternative to purchasing compound feeds is for a farmer to purchase the individual ingredients (referred to as ???straights???) and to prepare feed compounds himself " (http://www.bseinquiry.gov.uk/files/ws/s047.pdf).
My conclusion;
In the second half of the 1970s and beyond, UK farmers were being encouraged to increase their milk production. However, where unpalatable “MBM was fed in cows- when a farmer buying compound feed would not know what ingredients had been used to provide protein?
Meat products (MBM) are valuable only for simple- stomached animals. So, MBM is eaten readily only by pigs (100- 200 g) and poultry- hens (5- 10 g/ animal/ day). This product is not readily acceptable for ruminants (not acceptable- impossible in wildlife) because of the extraordinary smell. Therefore; if MBM is fed in domestic ruminants, it must be introduced into their diets gradually and continuously. So, a farmer buying compound feed would know what ingredients had been used to provide protein !!! In high milk producing cows, especially ; is not possible fed MBM one week (day) and does not next week (or day)!!!
And what is about; to prepare feed compounds himself? This is ???impossible??? in a small farm, especially; because about ???the extraordinary smell??? and a high risk about the low feed intake in other cattle- so, the profitability is very low.
At second, for example; why we found BSE positive animals ? three or more years after a ban on using MBM in dairy rations? (see examples from Europe, Canada, Japan)? So, there is the evidence that MBM is not an origin about the BSE when scientists only believe? (without any experiment or confirmation in field conditions?) that mad cow disease, or bovine spongiform encephalopathy, spreads when farmers feed cattle recycled meat and bones from infected animals. The disease is also only believed to be linked to the rare but fatal brain-wasting human variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease...
I described an alternative “BSE ammonia-magnesium” theory ( http://www.agriworld.nl/feedmix/headlines.asp?issue=3). This theory is based on the chronic Mg-deficiency- potentiated by hyperammonemia (high protein intake?). These mechanisms have a strong influence on CNS, especially in ruminants and carnivora animals ( http://www.bse-expert.cz).
Also according to the recent research; BSE can be “not infectious disease ". Why? At first, authors in Journal of Pathology (March, 2006) found that prion proteins implicated in the development of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, such as vCJD, may be markers for disease rather than the infectious agents. So, under laboratory circumstances prion-protein can be absorbed across the gut, it also shows that this is unlikely to occur in real life ( http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi- ... 5/ABSTRACT ).
And what is about the possibility of sporadic mutations- transmission of the disease gene? There is the explanation from Dr.Murphy; President of the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses (October 2006), he says; " Recent research has shown that the scrapie PrP protein differs from the BSE PrP protein at only seven amino acid loci, whereas the BSE PrP protein differs from the human CJD PrP at more than 30 loci. These differences explain the concept of strains and help explain why prions from one species might jump more easily into another species than another. It is difficult to find the terms to discuss prions ? for example, can we talk about mutants when there is no DNA? What would Watson and Crick think of all this? There is a familial form of CJD, accounting for about 10% of cases. In the familial disease there is are mutations in the gene encoding the normal protein such that the protein tends to fold in the abnormal way and tends to pile up into aggregates in brain cells with lethal consequences ... The prion protein in familial cases is the same in each family member that has it, and different in all other families. Sometimes the difference is as small as one amino acid, but these differences can be used to determine the pedigree of the prion. I 'm sure such analyses are being applied to the 10 cases just reported in the UK”; says Dr.Murphy ( http://www.accessexcellence.org/WN/NM/madcow96.html).
Other authors in Journal Biol. Chem. (November, 2006) found that small amounts of detergent-insoluble PrP aggregates are present in uninfected human brains, so insoluble aggregates and protease-resistant conformers of prion protein in uninfected human brains ( http://www.jbc.org/cgi/content/abstract/281/46/34848). More recently (February, 2007) authors in “Neuron” wrote; " Early functional impairments precede neuronal loss in prion disease; they occur before extensive PrPSc deposits accumulate supporting the concept that they are caused by a transient neurotoxic species, distinct from aggregated PrPSc” . ( http://www.neuron.org/content/article/a ... 7307000086).
Also other new findings (February 2007), offer significant insights into normal folding mechanisms as well as those that lead to abnormal amyloid fibril conversion ( http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 182836.htm). Until about five or six years ago, everyone assumed that the large amyloid plaques, or neurofibrillary tangles, that were found in the brains of Alzheimer 's victims were the cause of the disease. However, recent scientific discoveries indicate that these large, insoluble aggregates might merely be markers of the disease?they do not cause the disease ( http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 110558.htm).
An international team of chemists and molecular biologists reported (April 2007); " A mystery on which the new Nature paper sheds light is what causes different strains of prions (infectious proteins) in which the protein sequence is identical. Our research gives a strong hypothesis that the origin of prion strains is encoded in the packing of the molecules in the fibrils which we are seeing in the crystals”. They found that; Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, type II diabetes, the human version of mad cow disease and other degenerative diseases are more closely related at the molecular level. (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 102021.htm).
In addition, see also my “opinion- articles”; about the link between BSE and Alzheimer?s disease ( http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/youropi ... onid=11677 ) and the link between the hyperfunction (neurodegenerative diseases; Alzheimer?s disease?) and the hypofunction of glutamatergic (NMDA receptor) neurons in schizophrenia (http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/youropi ... onid=17968) and (http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/youropi ... onid=18538). .

The prion protein infection from transmissible BSE is then thought to travel to the brain via peripheral nerves, perhaps with assistance from the lymphoreticular system. In 2004, a study of 13,000 appendix and tonsil samples revealed that thousands of people may be unknowingly harbouring vCJD ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6334215.stm). However, recently scientists find connection between nerve cells and immune system. They have made visible an astounding number of contacts between immune and nerve cells. These include some of the most important immune cell types, such as B-lymphocytes, T-lymphocytes and dendric cells - all of which form connections to the nerves ( http://www.news-medical.net/?id=21792).
Also, according to the article “Should we still be worried?" (January 10, 2007) ( http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,1986657,00.html), there is an agreement about the BSE no infectiosity; see following text from this article; " But despite billions spent on efforts to save Britain’s beef industry and protect its citizens, all the major questions remain unanswered. The origin of the disease? A mystery. The number of people infected with vCJD? A mystery. The risk that those harbouring the disease will infect others? Again, a mystery . The politicians didn’t know what to do and the scientists didn’t know what to do. We didn’t know where it came from, what caused it, how bad it might be. We didn 't know anything " ??? “The danger now is not from cattle, it’s from other human beings," says another expert in vCJD .
This can be in connection that the story of BSE in Britain is a consequence of intensive farming (metabolic disease disease and neurotoxicity) and belongs in the “Organic Research” ( http://organicresearcher.wordpress.com/ ... ve-theory/). My alternative “BSE ecological view” can be well documented concerning the example “Chronic Wasting Disease” (CWD) http://organicresearcher.wordpress.com/ ... ef-hlasny/.
In addition, recently (October 2007) was found that abnormal prion proteins assumed to be the infectious agents that cause mad cow disease and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease might not be to blame after all. Experiments in mice also imply that current tests to detect and intercept meat from animals infected with BSE might miss some cases if diseased animals don’t have the abnormal proteins in their brains, so, Absent prions blow hole in BSE theory (http://environment.newscientist.com/art ... alth_rss20). Other experiment shows (October 2007) that scientists find new causes for neurodegeneration (http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/0702275104v1).
In this connection about people, there is an article (October 2007) about Elizabeth Smith (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/engl ... 040658.stm) ,she died from the human form of mad cow disease (vCJD). There I read; “Sometimes she would have meat with a meal, sometimes she wouldn’t. It wasn’t one particular kind of meat, either. It may be nothing to do with beef burgers???".
However, similarly it was found by experts (November 2000) into the case histories of 51 sufferers of vCJD has reportedly failed to produce a positive link with eating beef. The report from the National CJD Surveillance Unit in Edinburgh also found little evidence to support the theories that medical treatments or victims' occupations could be a factor in developing the disease (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/1006242.stm).
Seven years later; There will be no epidemic of the human form of mad cow disease in Britain, despite fears that the worst is yet to come, recently (September 2007) an expert said. We are “highly unlikely” to see a resurgence in the fatal brain condition, according to Professor Bob Will, director of the National CJD Surveillance Unit, who was speaking at a medical conference in Edinburgh (PRION 2007) (http://theherald.co.uk/mostpopular.var. ... mic_of_vcj d_in_uk_highly_unlikely.php).
In Britain, much of the alarmism about Mad Cow disease was never justified scientifically. It was pure, math-model-driven science fiction, just like Global Warming. But it was pushed very vigorously by the British science establishment, which has never confessed to its errors, and is therefore likely to make the same ones again. In politicized science, public hysteria actually builds careers; in real science, it tends to ruin careers
(http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/ ... gical.html).
Dr.David R.BROWN , lecturer and researcher at the University of Bath, is another dissident scientist who believes the entire BSE/CJD link must be completely reconsidered. He believes excessive exposure to manganese, a heavy metal that is, ironically, crucial to life and part of the daily diet, is the culprit behind both BSE and CJD.
His research team recently found that elevated manganese (Mn) was associated with prion infection. Although some central nervous system regions showed elevated Mn, other regions did not. The most consistent finding was an elevation of Mn in blood. So sheep infected with scrapie and cows infected with BSE have elevated levels of Mn in their blood before clinical symptoms appear, according to new research. These findings, published in the Journal of Animal Science, also show the possibility of using Mn levels in the blood as a potential diagnostic marker for prion infection (http://jas.fass.org/cgi/content/abstract/85/6/1596). However, these findings about “BSE; manganese theory"act in concert with my “BSE; ammonia- magnesium theory”. So, I will perform some interpretations in my website with conclusion; why some central nervous system regions showed elevated Mn, other regions did not? and why the most consistent finding was an elevation of Mn in blood? However, in the first place, this will be published- presented at the 29th World Veterinary Congres (Vancouver, July 27-31, 2008), see article; Neurodegenerative Diseases and Schizophrenia as a Hyper or Hypofunction of the NMDA Receptors (http://www.meet-ics.com/wvac2008/pdf/PS1-17Mar2008.pdf).
Sincerely,
Josef Hlasny, DVM,PhD., Czech Republic

BioWolff
07-06-08, 12:18 PM

Hlasny

With great respect to Dr. Hlasny’s extraordinary posting, I wonder if we are looking in the wrong place. The U.S. presence in Korea has never been fingered as an indirect trigger for anger but there must be some blowback. For a time the U.S. was blamed for bad relations with North Korea, as I recall. America’s reputation in the world has declined sharply since then. That’s my posit: that backlash against the U.S. is really the problem in Korea, not the beef.

Texas Longhorn
07-06-08, 09:33 PM

Better get it now.

US beef producers are dumping their stock not because of disease, but because they don’t want to feed them with rising feed prices. They would have to sell them here in the US at bargain prices, then go broke trying to buy feed for the remaining stock. If they sell to South Korea, they can maintain high prices (profits) in the US, and afford the feed for the remaining stock, which of course they’ll simply charge higher for. This is simply the oil story, being told with a different commodity. The oil from Iraq isn’t being sent to the US because that would keep prices low worldwide. We invaded Iraq, to to steal oil, but to control it. Mission Accomplished.


Have your say on this story

Your name/nickname (optional)
Message title
Message
Image verification This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots. (see: www.captcha.net)
(enter the verification code from the image above)


Top Stories  



RSS Feed