U.S. intelligence chief warns on Iran nuclear ambitions
The Sydney News.Net
Tuesday 3rd October, 2006
John Negroponte says Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons, and will have them by 2015 but admits he has no facts to support the claim.
Negroponte, who as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, led the American campaign to convince the UN Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, says Iran could have a nuclear weapon within four to nine years.
Speaking in his top floor office overlooking the Potomac River, the Director of National Intelligence says Iran is determined to get nuclear weapons and will have them soon if not deterred from its current course.
"We do not have any fast facts that could demonstrate to you a particular date by which we are certain Iran will have a nuclear weapon," he said. "But yes, it is our judgment, based on all the information available to us, that Iran is determined to acquire nuclear weapons and, secondly, that they are on a path to achieve that within the next several years. The estimate that we have made is that somewhere between 2010 and 2015 is when we judge Iran is likely to have a nuclear weapon if it continues on its current course.
The United States has been trying to round up support in the UN Security Council for sanctions on Iran. Parallel efforts are also underway for a diplomatic solution. The five permanent members of the Security Council plus Germany are offering incentives to get Iran to suspend uranium enrichment, a critical step to building nuclear weapons.
Iran denies it seeks nuclear weapons, saying it only wants atomic energy for peaceful purposes. Iran has refused to halt enrichment, although Tehran has floated the idea of uranium enrichment by another country on Iran's behalf.
Negroponte says that even though Iran does not yet have any nuclear weapons capability, evidence that it is moving in that direction is persuasive.
"You have to have insights into intention, you have to look at past behavior," he added. "I mean, among the factors we consider in the case of Iran is that in the past they've had a secret military program until it was revealed. We know that for 20 or 30 years Iran has been interested in acquiring nuclear capability. You can judge from their procurement practices. There is a whole variety of indicators that you can look at to get some sense of exactly what the intentions of a country are."
But former National Security Council staffer Gary Sick, who worked under three presidents, says the hard intelligence on Iran's nuclear intentions is not yet there.
"If there was really hard evidence that Iran was building a nuclear weapon, I think that we would know about it for sure," he said. "I think there would be a lot of evidence from the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency]. There would be specific evidence of specific sites that need to be visited. There would be photographic evidence, and the like. We do not have any of that. That does not prove that they are not building a weapon or that they would not in the fullness of time decide to do that. But I think that we are talking about intentions here. And I, for one, find it not easy to read Iran's intentions."
Asked if the intelligence failure on Iraq complicates convincing people of Iran's intentions, Negroponte admits that people do raise that issue, but adds that the intelligence system is much improved.
"We have done quite a bit of work on 'lessons learned' from the situation in Iraq, different mechanisms and procedures to improve the quality of our intelligence collection and analysis and our judgments," he added. "And, secondly, I think our principal partners and friends in the international community share with us exactly the same concern about Iran's intentions."
Intelligence Director Negroponte says a diplomatic solution to the issue is still possible.
"This does not rule out the possibility that at some point in the current diplomatic context that Iran might decide to forego its nuclear enrichment program in exchange for some kind of accommodation with the United States, the Europeans, and other members of the United Nations Security Council and the international community," he explained.
Gary Sick, who now teaches at Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs, says the matter of Iran's nuclear intentions is not yet at the level of crisis, as world media often label it. He describes it as a problem, and one that is solvable if the United States and Iran would sit down for serious negotiations.
But Washington says that without uranium enrichment suspension, there will be no direct U.S. participation in talks with Iran.
Email this story to a friend
Comments on this story
10-03-06, 11:53 PM
U.S. intelligence chief warns on Iran nuclear ambitions
There are two mortal enemies to the USA Iran and Saudi Arabia. This is particularly so because the politicians in the USA have prostituted their principles for oil. Also the regimes and people in the Muslim nations know the USA is weakened by rampant immorality in our society. Iran will not rest until it has the nuclear weapons with which to intimidate its neighbors and to destroy Israel. I love the way Genghis Khan dealt with the proud Persian Empire in antiquity. Look it up!!!
10-04-06, 05:59 AM
Pakistan should be divided.
Unless Pakistan is not divided, unless the ISI of Pakistan is sacked, unless
the back-bone of Pakistani Militarary is broken and their “nuclear weapons” are not destroyed...there shall be no peace in Afghanistan, no peace in
middle-east and the whole world. Write these sentences in your diary!
10-04-06, 11:20 AM
What happened to Iraq war a a result of Negroponte’s recommendation that Iraq had WMD.A total disaster indeed. Now he is recommending the same hipothesis for an invasion f Iraq.Should we have that kind of man amongst the Bush’s administration; ironically a Director Of Intelligence.Ris, Malaysia
10-04-06, 01:08 PM
O.K. Iraq had no “smoking guns” but they were, like Iran, searching for it.
Pakistan has the skit-weapon like North Korea who are black-mailing the
whole world. Meeting them at a later stage shall be too costly, millions of deads! More than the WWII.
Have your say on this story